The Problems with Tariffs: Lessons from Friedman, Sowell, and Williams

By Dr. Eric M. Wallace
Introduction
Tariffs have been a contentious economic policy tool throughout American history, with debates about their efficacy stretching from the early 19th century to the Trump administration’s trade wars with China and other nations. While tariffs are intended to protect domestic industries from foreign competition, they often have negative consequences that outweigh their intended benefits.
Prominent free-market economists such as Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams have long argued against the use of tariffs, citing their detrimental effects on economic growth, consumer welfare, and international relations. Furthermore, historical examples like the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 demonstrate how protectionist policies can exacerbate economic downturns rather than alleviate them.
Milton Friedman’s Critique of Tariffs
Milton Friedman, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, was a staunch advocate of free trade. He argued that tariffs are essentially a form of taxation that hurts consumers by increasing the cost of goods and reducing the variety of products available to them. In Capitalism and Freedom, Friedman explains that protectionist policies like tariffs ultimately lead to inefficiencies by encouraging resources to be used in ways that do not maximize economic productivity.¹
Friedman also addressed the issue of trade deficits, noting that they are not inherently harmful. Instead, they reflect differences in savings and investment between countries. In Free to Choose, he famously stated, “The most obvious argument for tariffs or other import restrictions is to protect domestic industries... Yet, such protection is fundamentally a form of welfare dependency.”²
Thomas Sowell on Protectionism
Thomas Sowell has repeatedly criticized tariffs and other protectionist measures as economically destructive. In Basic Economics, he emphasizes that tariffs hurt consumers far more than they help producers because the higher costs imposed on imported goods force consumers to pay artificially inflated prices.³
Sowell also discusses the unintended consequences of protectionism, particularly when it comes to retaliatory tariffs. When one country imposes tariffs, other countries often respond with their own, resulting in a tit-for-tat trade war that reduces overall economic welfare.⁴
Walter Williams on Tariffs and Economic Freedom
Walter Williams, a respected economist and columnist, consistently opposed tariffs, arguing that they are a violation of economic freedom. In Race and Economics, Williams explained that tariffs are nothing more than government-imposed barriers that limit the choices available to consumers.⁵
Williams also highlighted the moral argument against tariffs, noting that individuals should have the right to trade freely with others without government interference. For Williams, tariffs are not just economically harmful but ethically questionable.⁶
The Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act and the Great Depression
One of the most significant historical examples of tariff policy gone wrong was the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. Signed into law by President Herbert Hoover, this act raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels. Economists generally agree that the tariff contributed to a drastic decline in international trade.⁷
The tariff was intended to protect American industries during the onset of the Great Depression but instead led to retaliatory tariffs from other countries, which drastically reduced global trade by more than 60% from 1929 to 1934.⁸ While the Great Depression had many causes, the Smoot–Hawley Act is widely regarded as an aggravating factor that deepened and prolonged the economic crisis.
Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, in their seminal work A Monetary History of the United States, argue that monetary factors were the primary cause of the Great Depression, but they also acknowledge the negative impact of Smoot–Hawley on trade and investment.⁹
Conclusion
Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams consistently warned against the dangers of protectionism. Their critiques of tariffs are backed by historical evidence, particularly the disastrous effects of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act.
President Trump’s use of tariffs as an economic weapon reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how trade works. As these great economists demonstrated, free trade is beneficial, while tariffs harm both consumers and producers. The United States would be wise to heed their advice and avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.
Footnotes
1. Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
2. Friedman, Milton. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. Harcourt, 1980.
3. Sowell, Thomas. Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy. Basic Books, 2000.
4. Sowell, Thomas. Economic Facts and Fallacies. Basic Books, 2007.
5. Williams, Walter. Race and Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination? Hoover Institution Press, 2011.
6. Williams, Walter. The State Against Blacks. McGraw-Hill, 1982.
7. Irwin, Douglas A. Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression. Princeton University Press, 2011.
8. Eichengreen, Barry. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, 1992.
9. Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton University Press, 1963.
Introduction
Tariffs have been a contentious economic policy tool throughout American history, with debates about their efficacy stretching from the early 19th century to the Trump administration’s trade wars with China and other nations. While tariffs are intended to protect domestic industries from foreign competition, they often have negative consequences that outweigh their intended benefits.
Prominent free-market economists such as Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams have long argued against the use of tariffs, citing their detrimental effects on economic growth, consumer welfare, and international relations. Furthermore, historical examples like the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 demonstrate how protectionist policies can exacerbate economic downturns rather than alleviate them.
Milton Friedman’s Critique of Tariffs
Milton Friedman, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, was a staunch advocate of free trade. He argued that tariffs are essentially a form of taxation that hurts consumers by increasing the cost of goods and reducing the variety of products available to them. In Capitalism and Freedom, Friedman explains that protectionist policies like tariffs ultimately lead to inefficiencies by encouraging resources to be used in ways that do not maximize economic productivity.¹
Friedman also addressed the issue of trade deficits, noting that they are not inherently harmful. Instead, they reflect differences in savings and investment between countries. In Free to Choose, he famously stated, “The most obvious argument for tariffs or other import restrictions is to protect domestic industries... Yet, such protection is fundamentally a form of welfare dependency.”²
Thomas Sowell on Protectionism
Thomas Sowell has repeatedly criticized tariffs and other protectionist measures as economically destructive. In Basic Economics, he emphasizes that tariffs hurt consumers far more than they help producers because the higher costs imposed on imported goods force consumers to pay artificially inflated prices.³
Sowell also discusses the unintended consequences of protectionism, particularly when it comes to retaliatory tariffs. When one country imposes tariffs, other countries often respond with their own, resulting in a tit-for-tat trade war that reduces overall economic welfare.⁴
Walter Williams on Tariffs and Economic Freedom
Walter Williams, a respected economist and columnist, consistently opposed tariffs, arguing that they are a violation of economic freedom. In Race and Economics, Williams explained that tariffs are nothing more than government-imposed barriers that limit the choices available to consumers.⁵
Williams also highlighted the moral argument against tariffs, noting that individuals should have the right to trade freely with others without government interference. For Williams, tariffs are not just economically harmful but ethically questionable.⁶
The Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act and the Great Depression
One of the most significant historical examples of tariff policy gone wrong was the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. Signed into law by President Herbert Hoover, this act raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels. Economists generally agree that the tariff contributed to a drastic decline in international trade.⁷
The tariff was intended to protect American industries during the onset of the Great Depression but instead led to retaliatory tariffs from other countries, which drastically reduced global trade by more than 60% from 1929 to 1934.⁸ While the Great Depression had many causes, the Smoot–Hawley Act is widely regarded as an aggravating factor that deepened and prolonged the economic crisis.
Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, in their seminal work A Monetary History of the United States, argue that monetary factors were the primary cause of the Great Depression, but they also acknowledge the negative impact of Smoot–Hawley on trade and investment.⁹
Conclusion
Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams consistently warned against the dangers of protectionism. Their critiques of tariffs are backed by historical evidence, particularly the disastrous effects of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act.
President Trump’s use of tariffs as an economic weapon reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how trade works. As these great economists demonstrated, free trade is beneficial, while tariffs harm both consumers and producers. The United States would be wise to heed their advice and avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.
Footnotes
1. Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, 1962.
2. Friedman, Milton. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. Harcourt, 1980.
3. Sowell, Thomas. Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy. Basic Books, 2000.
4. Sowell, Thomas. Economic Facts and Fallacies. Basic Books, 2007.
5. Williams, Walter. Race and Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination? Hoover Institution Press, 2011.
6. Williams, Walter. The State Against Blacks. McGraw-Hill, 1982.
7. Irwin, Douglas A. Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression. Princeton University Press, 2011.
8. Eichengreen, Barry. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, 1992.
9. Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton University Press, 1963.
Dr. Eric M. Wallace is a trailblazing scholar, dynamic speaker, and passionate advocate for faith-based conservatism. With a distinguished academic background and an unwavering commitment to biblical truth, Wallace has become a leading voice challenging cultural and political narratives that conflict with a biblical worldview.
Wallace holds postgraduate degrees in biblical studies (M.A., ThM, Ph.D.), Wallace is the first African American to earn a Ph.D. in biblical studies from Union-PSCE (now Union Presbyterian Seminary). His scholarship and ministry experience equip him to address today’s most pressing sociopolitical issues through the lens of faith, reason, and historical accuracy.
Wallace holds postgraduate degrees in biblical studies (M.A., ThM, Ph.D.), Wallace is the first African American to earn a Ph.D. in biblical studies from Union-PSCE (now Union Presbyterian Seminary). His scholarship and ministry experience equip him to address today’s most pressing sociopolitical issues through the lens of faith, reason, and historical accuracy.
Posted in Opinion
Posted in Dr. Eric M. Wallace, Tariffs, Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, President Donald Trump, Economic empowerment, trade wars, Protectionism
Posted in Dr. Eric M. Wallace, Tariffs, Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, President Donald Trump, Economic empowerment, trade wars, Protectionism
Recent
The Problems with Tariffs: Lessons from Friedman, Sowell, and Williams
April 3rd, 2025
Toxic Entitlements: A Cultural-political Malignancy
March 25th, 2025
Jim Crow and Socialism: Two Sides of the Same Oppressive Coin
March 20th, 2025
Liberal White Women“?”
March 18th, 2025
Trump’s Colorblind Message Energizes Black Americans
February 15th, 2025
Archive
2025
February
March
2024
January
Cartoon 01/01/24Cartoon 01/02/24Claudine Gay Betrayed the American Values of My Black Elders to Exploit White GuiltCartoon 01/03/24Cartoon 01/05/24Cartoon 01/06/24Cartoon 01/07/24Cartoon 01/08/24We need a David, not a SaulCartoon 01/13/24Cartoon 01/09/24Cartoon 01/10/24Cartoon 01/11/24Cartoon 01/14/24Cartoon 01/12/24What Happens to a King Deferred? A ReduxCartoon 01/15/24Cartoon 01/16/24The Good Guys with Guns Part 1Cartoon 01/17/24America Works. DEI Doesn’t.Cartoon 01/18/24Cartoon 01/23/24Good Guys with Guns Part 2Cartoon 01/19/24Cartoon 01/21/24Cartoon 01/22/24Cartoon 01/24/24Cartoon 01/26/24Cartoon 01/25/24Cartoon 01/27/24
February
Cartoon 02/04/24Cartoon 02/03/24Cartoon 02/02/24Cartoon 02/01/24Cartoon 01/31/24Cartoon 01/28/24Cartoon 01/29/24We’ve Been Gay(ed) Part 1Cartoon 02/05/24Cartoon 02/06/24Cartoon 02/07/24Cartoon 02/08/24Cartoon 02/13/24Cartoon 02/12/24Cartoon 02/09/24Cartoon 02/11/24Cartoon 02/10/24Cartoon 02/19/24'Black America at Crossroads’ of Culture Wars as Presidential Election LoomsWe’ve Been Gay(ed) Part 2Cartoon 02/18/24Cartoon 02/17/24Cartoon 02/16/24Cartoon 02/15/24Cartoon 02/14/24Cartoon 02/22/24Cartoon 02/21/24Cartoon 02/20/24America Needs a “Black Wives Matter” Movement To Rebuild the Black FamilyCartoon 02/23/24Cartoon 02/24/24Cartoon 02/25/24Cartoon 02/26/24Cartoon 02/27/24
March
Cartoon 03/07/24Cartoon 03/06/24Cartoon 03/04/24Cartoon 03/03/24Cartoon 02/29/24Cartoon 02/28/24Cartoon 03/05/24Cartoon 03/02/24Cartoon 03/08/24Cartoon 03/10/24Cartoon 03/09/24The Debt...and it isn’t Climate ChangeCartoon 03/11/24Cartoon 03/24/24Cartoon 03/25/24Cartoon 03/23/24Cartoon 03/22/24Cartoon 03/21/24Cartoon 03/20/24Cartoon 03/26/24
April
8 Comments
100% correct, Eric.
Thanks
The difference in Hoover's and other tariffs is that in this instance we are not the initiator, but rather the responder to others tariffs.
n
nTrump has made it clear, you stop your "protectionism", we will drop ours. It is silly for us to pay 63% VAT on exports to India and allies theirs in for free. We do not do that domestically.
n
nWe are in a drastically different world from the one 30-100 years ago and everyone needs to step back and give Trump and his team a chance.
You're still using the word "protection." The government does not need to get involved because it always leads to trouble. Trump is wrong. The Free market can't be free if we start tariff wars. Mark my words, it won't work, and we'll be in danger of losing in the midterms and in 2028.
Eric,
n
nHow can you not see there is a difference in "protectionism" and protecting vital interests.
n
nhttps://x.com/KarluskaP/status/1907589593035084230?s=19
You're still using the word "protection." The government does not need to get involved because it always leads to trouble. Trump is wrong. The Free market can't be free if we start tariff wars. Mark my words, it won't work, and we'll be in danger of losing in the midterms and in 2028.
It doesn't matter, Eddie. No one is getting over on anyone. Their protectionism doesn't really help them in the long run. According to the economist, I've listed it stifles innovation and the ability to compete in the marketplace. We don't produce steel because the unions made it too costly to compete globally. The same is true of other industries. Union wages have made competition in many areas untenable. We don't need to step back when we have data that shows that tariffs don't work. Unless you think Trump has people working for him who know better than Friedman, Sowell, and Williams? I think not. A trade deficit means NOTHING. Trump is dead wrong and undoing any chance he had to keep the House and the Senate. The economy will not recover the way he thinks it will. I'd suggest you find a video of Milton Friedman where he talks about tariffs and trade deficits.
You're still using the word "protection." The government does not need to get involved because it always leads to trouble. Trump is wrong. The Free market can't be free if we start tariff wars. Mark my words, it won't work, and we'll be in danger of losing in the midterms and in 2028.
Eric,
n
nHow can you not see there is a difference in "protectionism" and protecting vital interests.
n
nhttps://x.com/KarluskaP/status/1907589593035084230?s=19
You're still using the word "protection." The government does not need to get involved because it always leads to trouble. Trump is wrong. The Free market can't be free if we start tariff wars. Mark my words, it won't work, and we'll be in danger of losing in the midterms and in 2028.
I believe tariffs are a tax and they are no different from other taxes. They will decrease productivity. Any time someone comes between a buyer and a seller and take some of the profit there is less to increase productivity and wealth of a country. I do not think it will be any different this time. Limited government has always been more productive than socialism. Tariffs are a form of socialism.
Thanks for responding.