Other Peoples’ Money and the Minimum Wage

By Eric M. Wallace, Ph.D.

Milton Friedman is known for saying, “That no one spends other peoples’ money well.” Meaning we all watch out for how we spend our own money, but seldom give much thought when that money is not ours. The truth is, we’ll shop for bargains when it’s our money at stake—often spending hours to do so. However, when the money we are spending is not ours, who cares if we get the best deal. We have a great example of this in the way government—federal, state and local—spends taxpayer dollars. It’s not the governor’s or state legislator’s money; therefore, their only concern is whether it will help them get re-elected.

In the most recent election all the liberals touted the notion that we needed to raise the minimum wage. Unfortunately, even some Republicans, who should know better, began to sing the very same tune. Raising the minimum wage during a pandemic or anytime is nonsensical. Who doesn’t want a raise? Who wouldn’t give others a raise if they could? HOWEVER, IT’S NOT YOUR MONEY. It’s the business owner’s money. Raising the minimum wage is tantamount to spending other folks’ money without permission. Most would call that looting or plunder—taking what isn’t yours. It’s kind of like what happened during the BLM looting, except more dignified. Many are in favor of stealing legally by proffering laws that make it illegal for businesses to higher a person at a lower wage, even if their skill set is only worth a lower wage. It forces business owners to pay higher wages for low skilled labor.

In a capitalistic free market economy, a person opens a business and then negotiates with employees to come work for them so that an employee and employer can make a living. Generally speaking, the employer makes more than his, her employees because he, she assumes most, if not all, of the risk. The employees’ risk would generally include not being paid for their labor, or not on time, if the business itself experiences financial problems or at worse folds. Mandating a minimum salary invariably prices people out of the market place and makes it more difficult for potential employees to negotiate a salary—especially those who have no skills or are trying to acquire new skills through on-the-job-training.

The Congressional Budget Office has said that about 1.3 million people will lose their jobs if the minimum wage is raised. The late Economist Dr. Walter Williams mentioned in his book, Race and Economics: How much can be blamed on discrimination, that in 1990 more that 80% of economist believed that increases in the minimum wage caused more unemployment “among the youth and unskilled.” (p. 40). So why do politicians push for the minimum wage? Because first of all those who are affected most by the raise don’t vote, or are too young to vote. Most people working minimum wage jobs are between the ages of 16-19: with those 16 to 17 unable to vote; and those 18-19 who generally don’t vote, or are uninformed voters.

Dr. Williams also mentioned that arbitrarily raising the minimum wage doesn’t increase productivity or the employees’ skill sets. It only gives the employers more incentive to “substitute machines for labor; change production techniques, relocate overseas and eliminate certain jobs altogether” (p. 46).

As a matter of fact, the raising of minimum wage does nothing for income inequality. Many people lose their jobs because of the extra cost to their employer who can’t absorb or pass on the cost to customers. So, they’re worse off. Those who receive the raise are still at the bottom of the income scale and the inflation of prices (because of the increased production costs) means their purchasing power is the same, or worse. The real problem is skill set inequality and education inequality, which prepares people for the work place as well as the opportunity to earn a decent living. Let’s not forget motivational inequality, which motivates a person to get out of bed and take a job that is “beneath them” so they can climb the latter of success in hopes of obtaining the job they really desire. Then there is also moral or principled inequality, which keeps a person from lying, cheating and stealing their way through life. You know taking what doesn’t belong to them.

This brings us back to the issue of other peoples’ money. No one has the right to tell a business owner how much he must pay his, her employees. That is a contract between the owner and those hired. They negotiate the price based on supply and demand for their particular services and/or skill sets. That is why Michael Jordan could negotiate a thirty million dollar a year contract back in the 1990s. It was Jerry Reinsdorf’s money—and Jordan had the skill set to demand that kind of salary.

To further the point, this is also biblical. Jesus uses a business concept to illustrate a spiritual concept. In Matthew 20:1-16, Jesus tells the parable of the workers in the vineyard. The owner hires workers for his vineyard through out the course of the day, from morning to evening. At the end of the day he pays them in reverse order. He pays the last hired first, and pays them the same amount he pays those who were hired in the morning. Those hired first have an issue with the owner. You see in the story the last hired have only worked one hour, while those hired earlier have worked all day. They call the owner out as being unfair. The owner replies in verses 13-15, “…Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are your envious because I am generous?” (ESV)

The spiritual lesson here is that God is generous. The reward of the Kingdom is not based on time worked but on the generosity of the Father. The “last will be first and the first last” (v. 16) and they will all receive the same reward—the Kingdom of Heaven. The parable illustrates the generosity of God who gives Kingdom access to whomever makes the faith commitment, regardless of when it’s made. This spiritual principle only makes sense if the business illustration is solid. The owner of the vineyard has a right to pay whatever he pleases to those who agree to work in his vineyard. It is his money and, in the parable, he decides to be generous with it. He is thus an illustration of God’s generosity.

Thus, the minimum wage argument is a nonsensical and unbiblical idea used by liberal politicians to, among other things, further their agendas. They are generous with other peoples’ money, giving raises without the owner of the vineyard’s (business’) consent. When they use other peoples’ money they are plundering those resources without permission from the owner. We’d be arrested if a private citizen did that. So why do we allow our government to get away with it? Because it’s not our money, so we don’t care. I think the better thing to do is to put the salaries of the politicians to a vote, whether they get a raise or reduction in salary. Don’t forget, their salaries are paid with our money!

[Eric M. Wallace, PhD is the president and co-founder of Freedom’s Journal Institute for the Study of Faith and Public Policy. He is also the Publisher of Freedom’s Journal Magazine, as black conservative magazine with a biblical worldview. This article is also an updated version of the one published in Wallace's book "Integrity of Faith." He can be reached at ewallace@freedomsjournalinstitute.org]

2 Comments


Charles Walkup Jr - January 27th, 2021 at 10:05am

I heartily agree. Proposition to replace the current minimum wage law.



Whereas every person involved in a business is responsible for either it's success or failure,

therefore, the total compensation of the lowest paid position (e.g. a janitor) must be at least n% of the total compensation of the highest paid position (e.g. CEO, owner)



A trial period of time (perhaps 2-5 years) would provide a final determination of the actual n%.



For example:

If we assumed a janitor (or similar low-wage job) needs a minimum of $20,000/yr. total compensation to earn a reasonable living, then if the designated % is

1%, that means the top compensated position is ($200,000 / .01 or) $20,000,000.

In other words, if the owner/CEO's total compensation was $20 million, the lowest compensation must be at least $20 thousand.

If highest compensation was $200 million, then the lowest would have to be $200 thousand.

If n% is set at 2%, then a high compensation of $20 million means the lowest must be at least $40 thousand.



This method would prevent the continually enlarging gap between the highest and lowest. Rather than government dictating an actual minimum wage, it would prevent a larger and larger share of the profits going to a few at the top, often chosen by a board, all of which worship Mammon/material things instead of God. Heads of businesses that work for God can be trusted to be just and fair with their fellow workers. This method would serve to alleviate exploitation of workers better than the current minimum wage.

Eric Wallace - February 10th, 2021 at 4:24am

Although your idea is better than the minimum wage, you're still trying to tell people what to do with their money. I'd add to the compensation bonuses for every one employee when the company does well. Thus if a good CEO brings real value to the company, the employees and shareholders benefit.

Recent

Archive

 2021

Categories

Tags

#race riot 1619 project 1776 1964 90 million ACT Abolitionists African Americans Afrocentric Al Sharpton Alabama Alaska Amazon American Flag American Hero American Voters American racism America Amy Coney Barrett Apple Asians Attorney General Keith Ellison Authenticity BLM Banks Barack Obama Behavior Bible Big government Bill of rights Black Americans Black Codes Black History Black Leader Black Lives Matter Black Millionaires Black Wall Street Black achievement Black community Black families Matter Black kids Black people Black racist Black towns Black voter suppression Black vote Blacks Black Breonna Taylo Bureau of Justice Statistics CARES Act CBS CEO Elon Musk CNN CRT California Capitalism Capitol Building Carbon emissions Catholic Cato Institute Charter schools Chicago Chinese Christianity Christian City government Civil Rights Act of 1964 Civil Rights Civil War Climate Change Coal Coca-cola College Board data Color Condoleezza Rice Congressional Black Caucus Congressional Budget Office Congress Conservatives Conservative Conspiracy Theories Cops Covid-19 Create a crowd Crime Cuba DNA DNC DOJ David Boaz Delta airlines Democrat party Democratic Party Democratic socialism Democrats Democrat Derek Chauvin Developer Dick Gregory Diversity Documentary Donald Trump Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Earth Day Earth Edgewater's mayor Edgewater\'s mayor Election integrity Equality Equity Eskimo FDA Facebook Fake News Fascism Fascist Fathers Federal Government Film Fire Fighters For the People Act Foundation Founding Fathers Frederick Douglass Free Market Freedm Freedom's Journal Insitute Freedom's Journal Magazine Freedoms Journal Institute Freedoms Journal Magazine Freedom Free Gangs Gasoline Gaza Strip George Floyd George W. Bush Georgia German Global Warming Goverment Governors Grades Guns Gwen Berry HBCUs Hamas Hard work Harriet Tubman Hatred Heritage Foundation High School Hillary Clinton Historically Black Colleges and Universities History Hitler Hollywood House Republican leadership House Housing Hugo Chavez Human Race Hypocrisy IMDb Ibram X. Kendi Identity politics Inclusion Independence Day Inventors Israel Jeff Bezos Jesus Christ Jews Jim Crow Jimmy Carter Joe biden John Cena John F. Kennedy John Kass John Lewis Voting Right Advancement Act John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act Jokes July 4th Jury Verdict Justice K-12 Kamala Harris Karl Marx Katrina Kingmaker Klu Klux Klan LAw LGBTQ LIverals Lab Larry Elder Latinos Latinx Law enforcement Lawsuits Legacy of Slavery Liberal progressives Liberals Liberal Libertarian Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson Lyft MLB MLK MSNBC Mainstream media Markets Marxist Mattel Maxine Waters Media Men Metaphore Michael Brown Middle East policy Minneapolis police department Morality Muslim NAACP NAN NEA Nancy Pelosi National Urban League Nazi Neck Holds Neutrality New Jersey Noam Chomsky Normal Normandy North Carolina Nuclear OPEC Obergefell v. Hodges Oklahoma Olympic trial Opportunity Oracle Oscars PPolice Palestinians Parental choice Pastor Patrisse Cullors Personal freedom Platform Power plant President Donald Trump President Joe Biden President Obama Press Principles Private companies Progressive Progress Race Card Race Racial hatred Racism in America Raphael Warnock Reform Rep. Liz Cheney Rep. Maxine Waters Republican Party Republicans Republican Rich Right to Vote Riots Robert F. Kennedy Rockerfeller Roe vs Wade Rule of Law Russians Russia SAT SEC SJW Scandinavia School Choice Scientists Sen. Bernie Sanders Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer Shawshank redemption Slavery Slaves Slave Social Justice Soviet Union Spacex Speaker Nancy Pelosi Speech Stacey Abrams Steve Crowder Steve Jobs Stock market Students Supporters Supremacist Supreme court Sweden Taxpayers Teachers' Union Tesla The Left The Reverend The Rich The West Thomas Jennings Thomas Sowell Tom Wolf Toymakers Trade workers Truth vs Lies Truth Tulsa 1921 Turnout Twitter US Constitution Uber Uncle Tom Underground Railroad United States flag Unity Vaccine Venezuela Vice President Kamala Harris Victims Victomhood Voter ID Votes Voting Rights Act Voting law Voting WGN WHO WWII WWI Walter Williams Warner Bros. Television Group Washington D.C. Water front Wealth creation Wealth White House White People White Supremacist White Supremacy White cops White-Savior Whites White Woke Racism Woke Women Work Worldview Wuhan YouTube abnormal academia academics access activists advancement adversary affirmative action alcoholic anarchy angry anti-semitic anti-trans antifa antiracists apartments arrested arrest assumptions attacks bad decisions biology boycott bureaucrats burglaries business owners business cancel cukture cancer charity cheating city council civility climte college colorblind colored comedian community compassion competition compliance conservative women contempt conviction corrupt politicians cost courage coverage criminal justice critical race theory culture war culture dad death penality debate delusion democracy dictatorship differential poverty discrimination diveristy driveway economic recovery economics economist economy education election reform elections emotions empathy employees employee employer employment enemies energy entrance exams entrepreneurs equal results ethnicity ethnic evidence executive orders fact-checkers faith leader false narrative farms first amendment force gender confusion gender genocide governance green new deal greenhouse gases groups guilty gun control gun violence handouts hate speech helpless blacks heroine hero homeless homicide human beings hyperbole immigration impeachment individuals inequality inflation information infrastructure inheritance inner-city innovation insurrection interview investments jobs kids labor lawlessness liberty lies life in prison loans lock downs major league baseball mandates manslaughter masks microaggression minimum wage misdemeanor misinformation mob violence money monument moral superiority murder name callling national anthem national debt neopronouns obfuscation officers one race oppressed opt out parents patents paycheck payouts people of color people piplines podium ceremony poineers police brutality police policy political exploitation politicians politics polling poverty power prison private schools progressives protest public health public investment public schools qualified immunity race and culture racial inequalities racism racist nation racist white cops racist radiation radical administration ratings reactor reforms regulations reparations resisting arrest respect restaurant retirement riot role model rules for thee and not for me scholar school second amendment self-reliance sexism sexuality shootings shoplifting skin color snow social distancing social media social security socialism spending standards state run stereotypes subjectivism subsidizing college subsidy systemic racism tactic taxes taxpayer teenagers the poor theft totalitarianism transgender woman transgender trial tribalism triillions tuition unemployment victim culture victimology violence violent crime virology voluntary wages war welfare white privilege women in history